Ascientist conducting an experiment quickly saw that she was not getting the results she expected. instead of continuing to collect data, she went back to redesign the experiment until the data came out the way that the hypothesis predicted. the scientist’s work did not follow the scientific method. which statement best explains why?
she followed the steps of the scientific method, but in the wrong order.
she made improvements to her experimental design rather than keeping it the same.
she failed to look at the data objectively by trying to get a desired result.
she carried out multiple trials rather than carrying out one trial correctly.

The correct answer is third statement.

Explanation:

The objective of the scientific method is to answer the question that the scientist has generated. In the mentioned case, the scientist has violated the scientific method as she is attempting to manipulate the data in order to support her hypothesis. The scientist should observe the data objectively and accept the fact that her data is not supporting her hypothesis. Even if the hypothesis has been proved to be false, the scientist still can answer their question, thus, the experiment would not be considered false.

i think that d. wind is the answer.   i missed the question when i answered a. currents.

fkk you n*gga