100 POINTS AND BRAINEST FOR BEST CORRECT ANSWER!! Explain why scientists should welcome evidence and arguments that contradict accepted scientific theories

I hope this helps if you need help on anything else let me know! I had a question like this before so I just copied and paste my answer. I had it in my history still so i just opened up the tab and copied it and pasted it.

Explanation:

Over time, science has never based there theories on assumptions. It must have been tested severally before the acceptance of such theories but every scientific submissions must be criticized which gives room for improvement in science. Science is like an object in motion, there is always advancement day by day. So evidences with general perceptions would be greatly welcomed and tested virtually using every necessary tools in order to validate the authenticity. Before anyone would criticize, such scientist must have tried the earlier theory severally and prove it to be wrong by providing answers that arises from such questioning, this birth another way forward that scientists in that field take as challenge to work on it and either oppose the earlier theory stated or validate the authenticity of the criticized theories

climate change and pollution

not sure if this is what you'r looking for eubacteria and archaebacteria