Which of the following is the most effective argument for the improved treatment of animals in CAFOs? The quality of animal products is improved when animal welfare is considered.
Many consumers are interested in buying from companies that consider animal welfare.
Animal welfare must be considered, as animals have the right to live free of confinement and cruelty.
Behavior in which the animal injures itself or others is less common when animal welfare is considered.

Many consumers are interested in buying from companies that consider animal welfare.

Explanation:

Factory farms, also known as Operators of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are interested in maximizing their production efficiency to increase their profits, regardless of the animals´ health and growing conditions. These factories tend to prioritize rapid growth and production over animal welfare, which might be an important reason to think that they do not care about the quality of their product, more than they do about their earnings.

Since during the last years, there is a sharp increase in the people´s conscientization of animal welfare and the conditions in which they are grown, probably the most effective argument for the improved treatment of animals in CAFOs is that many consumers are interested in buying from companies that consider animal welfare.

People who care about animal conditions will not consume animal products from factory farms, which eventually ends by affecting these factories´ profits. If CAFOs improve animal treatment and get higher animal welfare standards, they will have more people consuming their products, which is basically their main interest.

the "dirty dozen" chemicals banned in an international treaty are formally known as persistent organic pollutants, or pops. the united nations environment program provided this background on what they are and what they can do to humans and wildlife.

i hope this