Biology, 09.12.2020 07:10 tsimm3618

1. Declare your agenda outright Right at the very beginning, define your agenda in clear terms. Make sure that you state your opinion clearly.

2. Build your argument
A good editorial expresses your point of view while a great one manages to persuade others to join your camp. In order to persuade people, you need to have a sound argument based on facts and analogies. Once you have stated your opinion, acknowledge contradictory opinions and explain why you disagree with them. Feel free to use facts, statistics, quotations and theoretical explanations for criticizing your opponents’ views.

3. Strengthen your argument with examples
Nothing disarms your opponents better than cultural, social or political examples. This is a good time to speak about the ultimate consequences of artificial intelligence, either positive or negative.

4. Provide possible solutions
So, you have made a case for your views and demolished your opponents’ claims. The journey doesn’t end here. An editorial is primarily meant to indulge in constructive criticism i. e. even though it critiques one point of view, it must be able to provide a possible alternative. Don’t mistake an editorial for an opportunity to indulge in mindless criticism; instead, use it to offer a better vision for the future.

or just say it short can someone do an 2 paragraph argument eassay

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Biology

Biology, 20.06.2019 18:02

Which potential solution below best addresses the issue of loss of biodiversity in a north american ecosystem?

Answers: 3

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00

The accompanying figure shows the percent of selected dna sequences that match between a chimpanzee and other primates. these data support the hypothesis that the figure shows the percentage of selected d n a sequences that match between the chimpanzee and other primates. the human has an almost 98 percent match, the gorilla has an almost 97 percent match, the orangutan has a 96 percent match, the gibbon has an almost 95 percent match, and the old world monkey has an almost 92 percent match. the accompanying figure shows the percent of selected dna sequences that match between a chimpanzee and other primates. these data support the hypothesis that the figure shows the percentage of selected d n a sequences that match between the chimpanzee and other primates. the human has an almost 98 percent match, the gorilla has an almost 97 percent match, the orangutan has a 96 percent match, the gibbon has an almost 95 percent match, and the old world monkey has an almost 92 percent match. chimpanzees and gibbons are the most closely related the chimpanzee's closest surviving relative is humans orangutans are the primates least closely related to chimpanzees old world monkeys and gibbons are the most closely related

Answers: 1

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 03:30

The human genome project is devoted to mapping the general dna sequence of our species. this could lead to the development of new medicines, as well as the possibility of using gene therapy to treat certain diseases. however, there are some ethical issues surrounding the mapping of individual genomes. one concern is a) that your genes may change over time, making the project useless. b) that insurance companies could discriminate based on genetic make-up. c) that since this has never been done before, we should probably not do it now. d) that sequencing our individual genomes is so expensive, it is a counter-productive strategy.

Answers: 1

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 19:30

Forensic scientists think they know the identity of a skeleton. what rule should they use to select a relative whose dna could be used to try to confirm the identity?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

1. Declare your agenda outright Right at the very beginning, define your agenda in clear terms. Mak...

Questions