PLEASE HELP MEEE Question. Do you think China's one child policy was justified? What alternatives, if any, do you think would have been preferable? Did the policy reduce the impacts of human activity on the environment and if so how?

Based on overpopulation, the one-child policy did reduce the amount of offspring, however, it did not account for the preference of males by Chinese parents. The policy was partially justifiable for overpopulation, as the alternative would be to make having children incredibly expensive, to deter anyone from wanting children. The policy did not show large signs of reduction on the impacts of human activity on the environment, however, it did provide less competition in the job market.

hydroxyl -oh

alcohols, always polar, can form hydrogen bonds with h2o molecules

carboxyl -cooh  

cargoxylic acids, has acidic properties which is a source of hydrogen ions, found in cells in ionized for with a charge of oh-1

carbonyl > co

ketone if within skeleton, aldehyde if group is at the end of skeleton, k & a may be structural isomers, it determines 2 sugars (ketose & aldose)

amino -nh2

amines, acts as a base, it can pick up h+ ions from surrounding solution, ionized with charge of 1+

methyl ch2

addition to rna/dna affects and gene expression

phosphate -opo3 ²⁻

organic phosphates, contributes to negative charge to, molecule that it is a part of, and potential to react with h20

sulfhydryl -sh

thiols, cross-linking stabilize the protein, and it is structure