Why is it inadequate to rely solely on science to solve environmental problems? Science can t prove anything so it cannot be used to solve problems. Science can only inform decisions, but ethics are necessary to help us decide what we ought to do. The statement is incorrect - science is the only discipline necessary to solve environmental problems. Politics and economics are the real tools used to solve environmental problems.

it's not c. i took the quiz and got it wrong. so my best guess is b.

have a great day, and hope this .

the correct answer is - d. china has a large and growing population.

the fact that china has a large (the biggest) population, and it is still growing, doesn't hinder the agriculture production in the country. in fact, it can for increased production in the agriculture, since there's more labor force, as well the sheer mass of people produces lots of scientists that come up with new inventions as to how to improve this sector. nice example is the inner mongolia region in china, in general dominated by the gobi desert, but few scientist came up with a nice idea as to how to make the region productive by using plants that are very resistant to droughts, so lots of people have been employed, and the region is becoming greener and greener each year, and the production of food in this region is also increasing.

the elements of art are the visual tools that the artist uses to create a composition. these are line, shape, color, value, form, texture, and space.

the principles of art and design are balance, contrast, emphasis, movement, pattern, rhythm, and unity/variety.