9. If your cells were used to discover a cure for a disease do you think you should have first given consent for their use? Should you also receive something back if the research makes lots of money. Explain why.

If my cells were used to discover a cure for a disease I don't think it would matter to give consent because I would have saved lots of people. I think I should earn just a little bit of money, because they are my cells, but I don't think I should earn a lot or most of it.

Yes, you need to give consent because otherwise, they can not have any part of you without consent.

Explanation:

  You should expect some money even if it is a small amount to come to you due to you being the one with the cure therefor the scientist or bioglist would have to study them and would go on to trials if they make a vaccine. Always, give consent if you deem it the right choice never by force.

option a is correct i.e.

explanation:

in context to the membrane of nerve impulse, the outer membrane of neuron is semi permeable that is only sodium ions can pass through the membrane i.e. smaller ions can pass through the membrane while larger ions cannot pass through it.

emerald ash borer

the emerald ash borer is a green buprestid or jewel beetle native to north-eastern asia that feeds on ash species. females lay eggs in bark crevices on ash trees, and larvae feed underneath the bark of ash trees to emerge as adults in one to two years. hope this !