HEL PL Scientists cite evidence that Earth’s climate has been changing significantly over the past 50 years. They also argue that changes to Earth’s orbital path are NOT the cause of these significant changes to climate.

Which statement provides the strongest evidence in support of the scientists' argument?

a

Variations in Earth’s orbital path are consistent with accepted laws of planetary motion

b

Earth’s orbital path does not affect the amount of solar energy that Earth receives

c

Changes to Earth’s orbital path occur in a cycle that repeats every 100,000 years

d

Climate change cannot be demonstrated over a span of 50 years.

c. Changes to Earth's orbital path occur in a cycle that repeats every 100,000 years.

Explanation:

If changes to Earth's orbital path occur in a cycle that repeats every 100,000 years, then it wouldn't make sense that Earth's climate has been changing over the past 50 years. This cycle repeats and is over a very long period of time, so the climate wouldn't be changing significantly.

Not sure if my explanation helps, if it's any more assurance, I just got that question on a test and got it wrong, the answer was "c."

i love you and i play fortnite add me rod0107

b tumor cells have a cell wall instead of a membrane

explanation:

tumor cells different from normal cells because tumor cells have a cell wall instead of a membrane.