subject
Biology, 17.09.2019 04:00 dakotagorski05

To critique scientific arguments and increase the validity of scientific evidence, scientists
a. replace the data and conclusions from experiments that fail.
b. design new experiments to prove other scientists are wrong.
c. repeat their tests until they get the desired results.
d. review the experiments and conclusions of other scientists.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 23:30
In iceland, the mid atlantic ridge runs through the center of the contry. what can you conclude about the apperence of iceland many thousands of years from now?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00
Astudent is looking through a microscope at some cells of an onion root tip. many of these cells are undergoing division since the root tip grows quickly and requires more cells. which cell most recently underwent metaphase? w x y z
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 04:00
Asap indicate the coat color and the proportion of offspring with that color for each of the following crosses of rabbits. assume all are homozygous. alleles: a=agouti, c=chinchilla, a=albino, a is dominant over c and a, c is dominant over a agouti x chinchilla a) 1/2 chinchilla, 1/2 agouti b) 3/4 chinchilla, 1/4 agouti c) all agouti
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 05:00
(amoeba sisters video recap: pedigrees and need
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
To critique scientific arguments and increase the validity of scientific evidence, scientists
...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 24.11.2020 18:00
question
Mathematics, 24.11.2020 18:00
question
Mathematics, 24.11.2020 18:00
question
Mathematics, 24.11.2020 18:00
question
Computers and Technology, 24.11.2020 18:00
question
Mathematics, 24.11.2020 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722363