PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST ANSWER The Phlogiston theory in the 17th century attempted to explain burning. The theory stated that combustable objects contained a material called phlogiston, a substance without mass, color, odor, etc. After objects burned, the objects were dephlogistonated and were then in their true form. The Phlogiston theory was accepted until the 18th century, when Lavosier proved that combustion requires a gas that has mass. Phlogiston is evidence that A) scientific knowledge is exact. B) scientific knowledge can evolve. C) scientific knowledge is 100% proven. D) scientific knowledge does not evolve.

B) scientific knowledge can evolve

Explanation:

I took the USA Test prep

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

the framers of the constitution insisted that federal judges be nominated instead of elected due to their desire to have judges above the shifting whims of the masses.

the hope, whether achieved or not, was that federal judges would only be beholden to the law and that by not having judges be elected, they would be protected if that law dictated an outcome that ran counter to popular opinion.