Why might the carrying capacity for humans in the United States change if Americans ate more plant products than animal products? Feeding higher on the food chain would make more energy available for humans to assimilate. Consuming plant products would provide less energy because they are generally less digestible than meat. Eating producers would make available about 10 times more energy than eating primary consumers. A diet made up of more plant and fewer animal products would decrease the amount of energy available in food sources.

The correct option is:Food producers would make approximately 10 times more energy available than primary consumers.

Explanation:

Diets based on sugars, carbohydrates, fibers, proteins and vegetable fats (that is, with the increased consumption of fruits and vegetables) have much less complex structures than the protein in meat, so much more energy is obtained and easier and faster than vegetables.

A clear example is that carbohydrates have a digestion that lasts between half an hour and an hour, while meat takes at least an hour and a half to digest.

Meats are complex protein structures with primary, secondary and tertiary junctions that must be digested and corrupted with gastrointestinal enzymes, whereas the carbohydrate carbohydrates of fruits and vegetables already begin their digestion in the human mouth thanks to alpha amylase.

The faster the digestion, the faster the energy is assimilated in the form of glucose, and the energy currency that is ATP is greater in diets rich in carbohydrates like the one we are writing, based on fruits and vegetables.

the areas around the equator