subject
Biology, 14.07.2020 20:01 josephbig9

A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chain are interfering with larvae development. A climate scientist believes that a change in water temperature is depleting food sources from the water. Why are both of these options valid scientific hypothesis? A. Scientists with different educational can come to different interpretations of the same data. B. No educated guess can be considered a valid hypothesis since hypotheses are made before data collection. C. Scientific debate is always continuing and the scientific community never discards a hypothesis. D. Both scientists underwent the same training and, therefore, have equally valid hypotheses.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 00:00
As a small change in a person's dna can cause a genetic disorder
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 08:00
Can create a hboth of these instruments can measure wind speed. doppler radar and psychrometer anemometer and hygrometer doppler radar and anemometer radiosonde and psychrometer
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which set of terms best describes a community of miners who live out in the countryside of west virginia and use specialized geological equipment to analyze the composition of rock?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:30
Archaebacteria use for movement. celia flagella pili cell walls
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A population of shrimp suddenly starts collapsing. A biologist believes that toxins in the food chai...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 30.01.2020 08:51
Questions on the website: 13722359