a group of environmentalists was discussing the benefits and drawbacks associated with using fossil fuels. which argument best fits the conversation.

The question is incomplete as it lacks the apropriate options. However, the options are as follows:

1. Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

2. Fossil fuel reserves will never be depleted.

3. Fossil fuels are easily renewed.

4. Fossil fuel use does not affect the environment.

Option 1.  Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

Explanation:

Fossil fuels are made by the natural procedure in a more extended time frame, for example, anaerobic decay of the dead living resembling plants, and creatures. These plants and creature's decayed naturally to pilled up to frame coal, or common gases or raw petroleum.  

By the utilization of these fuels, the stores are constantly exhausting and as it can not be recharged it will not present in the future. Non-renewable energy sources expand the greenhouse gases in condition and influence it by increasing carbon in climate. Be that as it may, these energizes are less expensive in comparison to different fuels.  

Therefore, the right answer is - Fossil fuels are cheaper than alternative forms of energy.

humans can cause extinction of a species through overharvesting, pollution, habitat destruction, introduction of invasive species (such as new predators and food competitors), overhunting, and other influences. explosive, unsustainable human population growth is an essential cause of the extinction crisis.

explanation:

i didn't have the answer choices , but i tried my best.

a time line cause it goes from 685 to 978