If Avery had observed transformation using only the extracts containing degraded DNA, degraded RNA, and degraded protein, but NOT the extract containing degraded polysaccharides, he would have concluded that . View Available Hint(s) If Avery had observed transformation using only the extracts containing degraded DNA, degraded RNA, and degraded protein, but NOT the extract containing degraded polysaccharides, he would have concluded that . polysaccharides are the genetic material RNA is the genetic material the preparations were contaminated mice with diets rich in polysaccharides are resistant to bacterial infection

polysaccharides are the genetic material

Explanation:

It can be concluded that through multiple experiments, such as those of Griffith and Avery, the first one observed the transformation when a destructive bacterial gene is transferred to a harmless one, it will modify it, the second one shows that DNA is not the only responsible for make this change happen, since I experiment with multiple substances, including degraded polysaccharides, finding that the latter were the ones that generated the change.

answer: a) a compound microscope has a greater magnification ability than a simple microscope.

explanation:

the "power" of a lens is its resolution power, or its ability to distinguish between to closely located points. with the low power lens, it is likely you will see the rough form of the hay and maybe some movement of dots around the hay. however, when observed with the high power lens, the detailed features of the hay become visible and the microbes being grown are more clearly visible.

i hope this you