Which statement describes a problem with the peer review process in scientific research?

it can sometimes reject important new ideas or novel techniques.
it forces new scientists to meet the same standards that established scientists meet.
it always requires scientists to have to reanalyze their data.
it often makes it more difficult to justify a conclusion.

The correct answer is that it can sometimes reject important new ideas or novel techniques.

The problem with peer review process in scientific research can sometimes reject important new ideas or novel techniques.

Peer review can also be referred to as refereeing. This is a process which subjects author's scholarly work, ideas or research to scrutiny others who are experts in the same field.

Peer review their methods are used to maintain standard of quality, provides credibility and improve performance.

In academia peer review is used to determine the suitability for publication of an academic paper.

It is categorized by the profession or field or type of activity where activity occurs. For example medical peer review.

this transfer is call conjunction

idk let me see fdfdgdg