subject
Biology, 20.04.2020 22:41 liddopiink1

Plate Tectonics: Further Evidence
Background Reading

Like others before him, Alfred Wegener recognized an uncanny congruence in the shape of coastlines on opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean. South America's east coast appears as if it would fit snugly against Africa's west coast -- as though one continent had been cut or torn from the other. Then Wegener stumbled upon research findings that paleontologists had used to support their conclusion that a land bridge had once connected Africa and South America. This discovery was all the inspiration Wegener needed. Just four months later, he presented his theory of continental drift, in which he concluded that identical fossilized plants and animals existed on distant continents not because land bridges connected them, but because the continents themselves were once connected.
For years, Wegener amassed a diverse collection of evidence for his theory of continental drift, which he published in 1915 in the book The Origin of Continents and Oceans and updated several times before his death in 1930. Of the many patterns he presented, Wegener showed that Europe and North America, like Africa and South America, had fossilized plants and animals in common. So, too, did Madagascar and India. Rocks along the west coast of Africa and the east coast of South America showed glacial scraping patterns that were similar to each other -- on continents that couldn't possibly sustain glaciers now. In Wegener's mind, this evidence supported the theory of continental drift irrefutably. Most other scientists in the field disagreed.
As interesting as Wegener's evidence was, it did not explain what might cause continents to move around Earth's surface. Wegener proposed two possible explanations: the first suggested that centrifugal force caused by Earth's rotation might be responsible; the second said that the gravitational forces of the Sun and Moon might have broken up and moved the continents. Both of these explanations were quickly dismissed because the forces Wegener pointed to were not nearly strong enough to move continents.
Ironically, when Arthur Holmes, one of the few proponents of Wegener's theory at the time, suggested in 1928 that convection currents inside Earth's molten mantle might be responsible for continental movement, the idea got little attention. Today, convection currents are considered the most likely explanation for the now widely accepted theory of plate tectonics.
Wegener, for all his insight, failed to see what modern plate tectonic theory explains. Continents don't plow through the ocean floor like ships in a frozen sea. A dozen major plates and several smaller plates make up our planet's crust, which comprises both the surface of the continents and the sea floor. These plates are in perpetual -- but nearly imperceptible -- motion.

Discussion Questions
Answer in COMPLETE SENTENCES.

What did scientists find by using echo signals along the ocean floor?

Describe seafloor spreading.

If the seafloor is spreading and Earth is not getting any bigger, where is crust being destroyed?

Describe what is meant by a "plate".

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 19:30
What is a universal way that predation benefits the predator? predation increases mate availability. predation in defense of space. the predator gets the energy it needs to survive. the predator keeps parasites from hurting the species.
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:40
Which scientific design has both practical limitations and limitations due to scale? studying the effect of bleach on the growth of mold spores exposing cultures of duckweed to different intensities of light observing the replication of dna molecules with a hand lens using colored marbles to model a cross between two colors of rabbits
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 07:10
Me plz he did not infringe upon the policy making powers that he felt the constitution gave congress. but the determination of foreign policy became preponderantly a presidential concern. when the french revolution led to a major war between france and england, washington refused to accept entirely the recommendations of either his secretary of state thomas jefferson, who was pro-french, or his secretary of the treasury alexander hamilton, who was pro-british. rather, he insisted upon a neutral course until the united states could grow stronger. which provides the best objective summary of this excerpt? president washington made a good choice when he decided not to accept the recommendations of his advisors and instead insisted that the united states stay neutral during the war between france and england as president, washington believed that the united states should remain neutral in foreign policy even though he had advisors who recommended that he take sides during the war between france and england. washington did not make policy decisions during his presidency because he did not want to interfere with the policy-making powers that the constitution gave congress. washington refused to accept entirely the recommendations of either his secretary of state thomas jefferson, who was pro-french, or his secretary of the treasury alexander hamilton, who was pro-britis
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 10:50
Overtime the pond slowly becomes more acidic due to the release of chemicals from a nearby factory. which of the organisms would most likely survive the change to their environment?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Plate Tectonics: Further Evidence
Background Reading

Like others before him, Alfred...
Questions
question
World Languages, 20.02.2022 04:00
question
English, 20.02.2022 04:10
Questions on the website: 13722361