Which is a negative consequence of using DNA technology in forensics?

connecting parents to children through paternity testing

convicting guilty people of crimes based on DNA results

having a backlog of untested DNA samples

matching relatives to a missing person’s DNA

-its not the second one-

having a backlog of untested DNA samples

Explanation:

Often, there will be lots of samples collected for DNA at a crime scene. This is to try and get a DNA sample from something, because we cannot be sure what will or will not have DNA.

Remember, DNA testing has been around for a relatively short time - it has only been used routinely in the last 20 years or so. Even in this short time, it has had a lot of success.

That means that everyone analyzing a crime scene will be collecting samples to be DNA tested. This huge demand for the services (which is increasing every year) means there is a huge backlog of DNA samples that labs cannot keep up with.

as the gila monster consumes the eggs or young of the desert cottontail and gambel's quail, thus its main food supply is only accessible for a restricted time duration every year. however, for this, the gila monsters exhibit three adaptations, which elevate their survival rate in the desert condition.  

first, is that they possess huge bodies, and can consume greater concentrations of food during a small period. secondly, they require to feed infrequently as they can accumulate fat in their tails. ultimately, their rate of metabolism is very low, so that they can burn their reservoirs of fat gradually.