Tara prepared a report to show how the amplitude of waves affects the energy of waves. Is her graphical representation correct? Why or why not?

The energy of the wave is directly proportional to the amplitude of the wave. The curve, in the graphical representation of Tara is incorrect.

The amplitude of wave:

It is the height of the wave. It measured the length from the peak (highest point) to the trough (lowest point). The amplitude of the wave is directly proportional to the energy of the wave.

In the graphical representation of the Tara, the curve is downward. This is showing that the energy of a wave decreases while the amplitude of that wave increases.

Therefore, the graphical representation of Tara is incorrect.

To know more about waves, refer to the link:

link

Hello. To answer this question you need a chart, which is attached below.

The graphic representation made by Tara is not correct.

Explanation:

As you can see in the image below, and as explained in the question above, Tara built a graph to show how wave amplitude affects wave energy. However the graph made by her is incorrect.

This is because the graph made by Tara shows that the energy of a wave decreases as the amplitude of that wave increases. This is not true. What really happens is that as the amplitude of a wave increases, the energy increases together, proportionally.

answer: a) a compound microscope has a greater magnification ability than a simple microscope.

explanation:

there are 35 white marbles

step-by-step explanation:

y- yellow marbles

4y + 5 = 45

subtract 5 from both sides

4y = 40

divide for from both sides

y = 10

plug in 10 to get 40 yellow marbles then subtract by 5 to get 35 marbles

thus there are only 10 yellow marbles