How can evidence from an experiment be explained in relationship to the hypothesis? as a prediction as a question as an inference as a conclusion

Weights of golden retriever dogs are normally distributed. samples of weights of golden retriever dogs, each of size nequals15, are randomly collected and the sample means are found. is it correct to conclude that the sample means cannot be treated as being from a normal distribution because the sample size is too small? explain.

She planned to observe the flowers for the next five days for an hour at the same time each afternoon. then she wou the data in a multiple line graph to compare the number of bees that visited each flower. which statement best descr data in this investigation?

What claim did thorne make? what evidence supported his claim?