The clownfish readily swims among the tentacles of the sea anemones; the parrotfish avoids them. one hypothesis for the clownfish's apparent immunity is that they slowly build a tolerance to the sea anemone's toxin. a second hypothesis is that a chemical in the mucus that coats the clownfish prevents the nematocysts from being triggered. which of the following graphs supports the second, but not the first, of these hypotheses?
a) ab) bc) cd) d

The answer in terms of graph is attached below.

Explanation:

Hypothesis may be defined as the particular or the proposed explanation of the particular phenomena. The statement or information can only become a hypothesis if it scientifically proved by the experiments.

The result of any experiment can be best explained in the graph forms. The graph forms results can be easily analyzed and easy to understand for the other observer as well. In the given graph, the clown fish has the large number of the non discharged nematocysts.

it creates acid rain

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."