Why is adult stem cell research less controversial than embryonic stem cell research?
question 20 options:

adult stem cell research has wider medical applications.

consent can be obtained from adult stem cell donors.

donated cadavers can be used to harvest adult stem cells.

stem cells from adults require no animal experimentation.

｡☆✼★ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  ☾

The correct option would be B. consent can be obtained from adult stem cell donors.

The controversy behind the other option is that it is a form of life, but no consent is taken from the actual life. (i know it's phrased weirdly, my bad)

Have A Nice Day ❤  

Stay ! ヅ  

- Ally ✧  

｡☆✼★ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━  ☾

Consent can be obtained from adult stem cell donors.

Explanation:

Considered very special cells, stem cells appear in humans even during the embryonic phase, that is, even before birth. As soon as the baby comes into the world, some organs still hold a small portion of stem cells within them, which become responsible for the constant renewal of that specific organ. The extraction of these stem cells has been the subject of controversy for years. This is because many people believe that it is an invasion of the baby's body that does not have the capacity to consent and protect its own organism.

However, some of these stem cells accompany the human being until adulthood (in smaller quantities than the baby) the extraction of these cells in adults is less controversial, because unlike the baby the adult can consent to the manipulation of his organism.

gfgfgfgfgfgf

explanation:

supercell thunderstorms are perhaps the most violent of all thunderstorm types, and are capable of producing damaging winds, large hail, and weak-to-violent tornadoes