Dr. bob designs and performs an experiment to test whether a new brand of raincoat is waterproof. after running the experiment and collecting the data, dr. bob concludes that the raincoat is in fact waterproof. however, when other scientists perform the same experiment, they all get different results, that show that the jacket is not waterproof. this process of double checking the results of an experiment by other members of the scientific community is called a) proofreading. b) a conclusion c) collaboration. d) peer review.

The correct option is D) Peer review

Explanation:

Peer review can be described as an evaluation made for somebody's work by the people of equal calibre. Peer review is very important in scientific researches as it depicts the validity of work done by other people.

In the above-mentioned scenario, the work of Dr. Bob is being evaluated by scientists who have equal calibre like Dr. Bob. Hence, the results by other members of the scientific community would be considered as peer review on Dr. Bob's work.

you dont brother god luck

blah

explanation:

bc blah