subject
Biology, 28.11.2019 02:31 carliefox26

In a study to determine the incidence of a chronic disease, 150 people were examined at the end of a 3-year period. twelve cases were found, giving an incidence rate of 8%. fifty other members of the initial cohort could not be examined; 20 of these 50 members could not be examined because they died. does this loss of subjects to follow-up represent a source of bias that may have affected the study results? answer yes or no and provide an explanation.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which is not a likely outcome after extensive irrigation of dry farmland? useless, unproductive soil salinization of the soil depletion of groundwater nutrient-rich soil
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:40
Which statement is the best summary of the model? a-a series of aerobic and anaerobic reactions take place in cells b- the sun's energy moves through trophic levels in a food chain c-light energy is converted into stored chemical energy plants.d- food molecules are broken down in the cells if living things.
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00
What changes the stability of the element
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 14:10
Match each medication with its description.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In a study to determine the incidence of a chronic disease, 150 people were examined at the end of a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2022 14:00
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2022 15:00
Questions on the website: 13722361