What conclusion can you draw from the hereditary versus environment debate?

The conclusion I can come to is that human beings have not yet reached a sufficient degree of understanding to say with certainty whether heredity or the environment is primarily responsible for the human organism as a whole.

Explanation:

Psychology has always been divided into two major fields to explain man's personality: heredity and the environment.

We have our mother's green eyes, and our father's freckles, but where did we get the singing talent? Did we learn from our parents or was it predetermined by our genes? While it is clear that physical characteristics are hereditary, the genetic waters become a little muddier when it comes to individual behavior, intelligence and personality. Ultimately, the old argument of nature versus genetics was never really won. We still don't know how much of what we are is determined by our DNA and how much our life experience, but we know that both play a role.

i'd say that the moon rock is about 2.2 billion years old.