Conclusions based on flawed data that does not answer a testable question is an example } an inference b) a scientific explanation c) pseudoscience d) science

Option C, pseudoscience

Explanation:

When a fact has no logical or scientific backing to support its existence and is considered true only on the basis of beliefs prevailing in any society since ages. For example - spiritual science , horoscope, palm reading, tarot card, existence of God etc.

Thus, any flawed data that cannot be tested comes under the category of pseudoscience.

Hence, option C is correct

but there is no

i guess you forgot putting it.

helicase, i think thats it