Which of the following is not representative of the tragedy of the commons? a. the constant pumping of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by factories, automobiles, and powerplantsb. the building of a house on new residential propertyc. the over-grazing of farmland by a cow farmerd. the over-fishing of tuna in the ocean

a chair, a bed, and a toothbrush

explanation:

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

not sure if this is what you'r looking for eubacteria and archaebacteria

true is the