First person who answers this will be marked brainliest!
you may copy it from other websites just don't copy the incorrect answer !

check your original prediction or hypothesis about how the layers were correlated. did you predict the correct layer that would have the dinosaur fossil? explain whether your prediction was correct. tell what clue made the biggest difference. the one on top is the first page and the bottom image is the one that is on the next page (connected) just couldn't fit in the whole page

Okay so the answer can vary because it is based on what you said your hypothesis was, so there really isn't an incorrect answer.

Your hypothesis was correct. In Idaho the fossil was in layer d, meaning that during this time there were dinosaurs in this area and most likely in other areas such as Spain as well. Based on how sediments work, which is to say that  the oldest is on the bottom and youngest on the top, dinosaurs who died in different areas should have their fossils in roughly the same area as each other (so around layer k in spain). Levels of sediment wouldn't be drastically different in different areas. Dinosaurs didn't exist far before layer d and k. We can tell this because there are no fossils in the lower layers, which is the sediment that collect before the dinosaurs in layer d died.

Let me know if this makes sense, if it answers your question, and if there is something that I need to clarify

1. a host loses nutrients to a parasite

2. a parasite only benefits when the host is alive (cause if the host dies the parasite dies with it )

3. producers to consumers

4. the tapeworm is a parasite

5. they convert energy from the sun (photosynthesis)

6. sunflower-robin (i think im 80% sure)

7. producer

8. consumer

9. prey

10. fresh water snails ( cause the green algea is the producer and the snails are the primary consumers and the small fish consumer so is the big fish)

gold i'm pretty sure i might be wrong