Chimpanzees and humans share approximately 99 percent of their dna because they have a common ancestor. why is the evolutionary geneticists’ comparison of human and chimpanzee dna significant?

The comparison of chimpanzee and human DNA is significant since:

Explanation:

Evolutionary geneticists must base themselves on evident bases that allow them to reaffirm that indeed living beings have been in a constant evolution for millions of years, therefore, the species that exist today should have ancestors in common, this is the case of DNA. similar between humans, chimpanzees and other primates, which being so similar (99% is a fairly significant similarity) allows us to affirm that these species had a common ancestor, from which they evolved differently.

hey, i believe your answer would be d. sugar ribose and the base uracil. i believe this is the answer, because rna consists of sugar ribose, adenine, guanine, cytosine, and uracil.

your first option is incorrect, because that's dna. where it consists of sugar deoxyribose, adenine, guanine, cytosine and thymine.

your second option is also incorrect, this is because sugar deoxyribose is in dna, and uracil is in rna. these two do not make sense together.

your third option being incorrect, because sugar ribose is in rna, but not the base of thymine. rna consists of uracil, not thymine.

lastly your fourth option being correct! this answer is correct, because both sugar ribose, and the base uracil are in rna! ~

answer is d. sugar ribose and the base uracil.

the titanic would be the correct answer