Summarize the nature versus nurture debate, and explain how contemporary theorists view this debate.

One of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology is the Nature vs Nurture debate. Each of these sides have good points that it's really hard to decide whether a person's development is predisposed in his DNA, or a majority of it is influenced by this life experiences and his environment.

Theorist argue about what influences development. Some say it's nature, and others say it's nurture. Most theorist believe it's a combination of them both.

solvent

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

succession returns a disturbed

ecosystem to a more stable state. this is also classified into two (2) types:

primary succession and secondary succession. the primary succession arises when

a new land is transformed and a bare rock has been exposed providing an environment

that can be occupied for the first time. while, secondary succession occurs

when a previously occupied environment was disturbed that kills much of all its

community

explanation: