ANSWER the hole thing no links or you will get reported whoever answers it first the RIGHT way will get 100 points+brainiest

100 points

Alexander the Great…Was He Really?
Complete this graphic organizer to prepare you for writing your opinion about whether or not Alexander was really great. You will need to support your claim with a minimum of Two pieces of evidence that you will be able to provide solid reasoning for. Be sure to include the source for ALL of your evidence.

Claim:
Alexander of Macedonia was . . .

Support your Claim:
Evidence: (what information from the documents support your claim)
Alexander was good and bad. He was bad in a sense that his legacy was the end of Macedonian Empire that Philip and Alexander took so hard to build. His legacy was also a disaster for the Mediterranean world and for Greece, because those regions were plunged into 40-years of warfare among these successors.

Reasoning: (how does the above evidence support your claim)

Source: (which document you got your evidence from)

Evidence: (what information from the documents support your claim)

Reasoning: (how does the above evidence support your claim)

Source: (which document you got your evidence from)

In the box below write your paragraph using at least two pieces of evidence from the documents. Minimum 4-6 complete sentences.
Was Alexander the Great actually great or not so great?

ANSWER the hole thing no links or you will get reported
whoever answers it first the right way will get 100 points

I will give your Answer

Explanation:

Alexander the Great was famous for his military power and is a legendary figure in history.

Much of what we know about Alexander the Great is unreliable and steeped in myth; a lot of these mythologies were used by Alexander’s successors.

In the Kingdom of Thrace, during the reign of Lysimachus—a successor of Alexander the Great who lived from 361 BCE to 281 BCE—an interesting coin was issued. This coin, which featured the head of Alexander the Great with ram’s horns on either side of his crown, was issued in the ancient city of Parium, in the northwestern region of modern-day Turkey. The horns were the symbol of the Egyptian god Amun—or Zeus, who is often conflated with Amun—from whom Alexander claimed descent. Flanked with these godlike horns, Alexander attained the status of a deity.

Surprisingly, Alexander himself did not issue coins with his own image; his successors did. Why would his successors refer back to their deceased predecessor as they established new empires? The reason is that Alexander the Great was—and still is—a powerful symbol of power, military genius, and conquest, whether or not this description of him is historically accurate. His image, name, and legendary power remained resonant—and politically visible—long after his death

Silver coin; left, front,, head of Alexander the Great wearing the horns of Zeus Ammon; right, back, seated Athena.

Silver coin; left, front,, head of Alexander the Great wearing the horns of Zeus Ammon; right, back, seated Athena.

Silver coin; left, front,, head of Alexander the Great wearing the horns of Zeus Ammon; right, back, seated Athena. Image credit: British Museum

Surprisingly, Alexander himself did not issue coins with his own image; his successors did. Why would his successors refer back to their deceased predecessor as they established new empires? The reason is that Alexander the Great was—and still is—a powerful symbol of power, military genius, and conquest, whether or not this description of him is historically accurate. His image, name, and legendary power remained resonant—and politically visible—long after his death.

A history steeped in myth

So how do we tell the history of Alexander, pulling apart the myths and legends and reconstructing an accurate narrative? It’s a difficult task, but it’s an important one, because the history of Alexander is a history of the Greek empire, which had a massive influence on vast regions stretching across Europe, Asia, and Africa.

We have ancient narratives of Alexander’s life, written between 30 BCE and the third century CE—hundreds of years after his death. The earliest known account is by the Greek historian Diodorus, but we also have histories written by other historians, including Roman historians; these writers are called the Alexander historians. They interpreted written accounts from shortly after Alexander’s death, penned by those who fought alongside Alexander on his campaigns.

Detail showing Alexander the Great.

Detail showing Alexander the Great.

Detail showing Alexander the Great. Image credit: Wikipedia

It’s unclear how reliable these narratives are, however, as they are mingled