PLEASE HELP FAST THIS IS TIMED Imagine that a piece of art has been critiqued by two different critics. Most of the reviews agree that the work is technically well done and that the artist has successfully conveyed their message. But the first critic just does not like the piece while the second one is very impressed. How should the reader interpret these conflicting reviews?

Since they disagree, neither review is particularly valuable.

The first critic is probably a better judge of the art than the second one.

It is a solid piece of work that appeals to some people more than others.

If it was a really good piece of art, all critics would agree on its meaning.

It is a solid piece of work that appeals to some people more than others.

yay

i love free points

tysm

~courtney

very interesting question. i'm a guy, so my vote hardly matters, but blue according to my wife is a purple with more blue than red.

the "brown"   is not mauve. that's the tough one. it has more brown the mauve in it. you almost need a color wheel to tell or a paint sample book. her gloves are a deeper purple.

i would also qualify this by saying you need say how good your monitor is. i'm working with a lap top so i couldn't swear by anything i've written is accurate. i had 3 women offer an opinion. they were not in agreement and they were not certain.

for posting. i'm more of a math type so i'm staying out of this but it was lots of fun.