I'll give 70 points and brainliest Compare two artworks:
Winter - Pieter Bruegel (1565)
Beach at Sainte-Adresse - Claud Monet (1867)
I couldn't upload both artworks here so you might have to Google to see what it looks like.

You can use this to help:

Part 1 ; Critical Process: Paragraph 1 and 2

Four steps of art criticism
1. Description / “Character”:
Describe the work without using value words such as "beautiful" or "ugly":
What is the written description on the label or in the program about the work?
• What is the title and who is (are) the artist(s)?
• When and where was the work created?
• Describe the elements of the work (i. e., line movement, light, space).
• Describe the technical qualities of the work (i. e., tools, materials, instruments).
• Describe the subject matter. What is it all about? Are there recognizable images?
• A gathering of information; names, dates, size. What do you see, feel, hear, smell, taste? Also, contextual information such as facts about the artist or the times in which the art was made.

Subject Matter: What is in the art work (objective)?Medium: What tools, materials, or processes did the artist use?
Part 1;Describe the two paintings in detail so that your readers can easily visualize them without actually seeing them. Explain how the perspective, technique, and compositional features of each painting help create contrasting rhetorical effects. In your analysis, focus on two or three specific points of contrast. Support your analysis by referring to specific details from each painting.

Give your essay a thesis and a clear, logical organization. Your first paragraph should start with a strong lead, provide any necessary background information, and end with a clear thesis statement.

2. Analysis / “Setting”:
Describe how the work is organized as a complete composition:
• How is the work constructed or planned (i. e., acts, movements, lines)?
• Identify some of the similarities throughout the work (i. e., repetition of lines, two songs in each act).
• Identify some of the points of emphasis in the work (i. e., specific scene, figure, movement).
• If the work has subjects or characters, what are the relationships between or among them?

• Analysis: A discussion of formal elements and principles. Provide information about how the artist presents subject matter. Tell of the artwork's composition, arrangement, and visual construction.
• Elements: Line, shape, light and value, color, texture, mass, space, volume.
• Principles: Scale, proportion, unity, rhythm, balance, directional force, emphasis or subordination.

3. Interpretation / “Plot”
Describe how the work makes you think or feel: III. Interpretation: What is the artwork about?
• Interpretive Statement: Express what you think the artwork is about in one sentence.
• Evidence: What evidence inside or outside the artwork supports your interpretation?
Describe the expressive qualities you find in the work. What expressive language would you use to describe the qualities (i. e., tragic, ugly, funny)?
Does the work remind you of other things you have experienced (i. e., analogy or metaphor)?
How does the work relate to other ideas or events in the world and/or in your other studies?

• Interpretation: What is the artwork about?
• Interpretive Statement: Express what you think the artwork is about in one sentence.
• Evidence: What evidence inside or outside the artwork supports your interpretation?
• How

4. Judgment or Evaluation / “Conflict”:
Present your opinion of the work's success or failure:
• What qualities of the work make you feel it is a success or failure?
• Compare it with similar works that you think are good or bad.
• What criteria can you list to help others judge this work?
• How original is the work? Why do you feel this work is original or not original?
Judgment: Is the artwork successful? Why or why not.