Pop art aimed to undermine the "high art" tendency to value only works that were "original" and "unique." To what extent do you think it is important for artists to strive toward creating something new and original? How can such works as Andy Warhol’s Thirty Are Better than One, that reuse earlier art, also be seen as creative and valuable?

If artists has the express need to be creative on a project that is entirely new and uniquely developed without any imitation or copying, they ought to be sure that it is not just anything but a project that the audience can fully come into terms with.

Works as in the given case of Andy Warhol's "Thirty Are Better Than One", is making out an impression on creativity and of esteem value as its aim is to produce a photocopy of the Mona Lisa, which was originally created and formed by da Vinci as it speaks of the area of consumerism "more is better".

perimeter = 2l +2w, divide total perimeter by 2 for total length of 1 side and 1 width

172/2 = 86 (  total for 1 side and 1 width)

86-24 = 62 (since length is 24 ft longer subtract 24 then divide by 2 for width)

62/2 = 31

width = 31 feet

length = 31 +24 = 55 feet

check: 31*2 = 62, 55*2 = 110,  110+62 = 172