Public relations firms often operate within a dichotomy, especially when it comes to statistics. it is a common suspicion that statistics can be manipulated to distort the truth. yet pr practitioners depend on statistics to clarify complex scenarios for the clients they are advocating. when massaging statistics, practitioners must balance advocacy with

Objective independence

Explanation:

Administrators must perform their duties “under the principle of personal responsibility with freedom of judgment or judgment and independence with respect to instructions and links from third parties.

This reflects the idea that administrators are not subject to an individual mandate (of the partner or partners who have appointed him or who have contributed their votes to his appointment) that obliges him to attend the indications or instructions of the dominus and promote his interests .

The duty of objective independence, that is, that which is required, for example, to be an independent director. It requires subjective independence that cannot be confused with a non-existent duty of impartiality of administrators drawn by personal relationships with certain partners. These will lack objective independence - and that will make their decisions judicially reviewable to see if they are compliant or not with the social interest - but they must preserve subjective independence and form their judgment, acting, like all other administrators, to good faith, with freedom of judgment or judgment.

i think it's but if you get it wrong its not my fault : )