Consider: a) If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is around to hear it, does the impact of the tree make a sound?

b) If a tree stands in the forest, and there is no one there to experience the tree, does the tree exist? If so, exactly in what sense does it exist?

Next, suggest how Locke on the one hand, and Berkeley on the other, would go about answering both a) and b) above. Keeping in mind Locke’s distinction between primary and secondary qualities, and then detail Berkeley’s criticism of this distinction.

Please help its for an essay and please dont give me a flie. Thank you.