Identify the constitutional clause that is common in Shaw v. Reno and Miller v. Johnson. b) Based on A, explain how the similarities in the facts of the case led to the rulings in each case. c) Explain the justification established by the Supreme Court that was used for their rulings in each case.

renewable resources- resources that can be replenished (such as trees)

nonrenewable resources- resources that are gone once they are used (such as fossil fuels)

producer-person who makes goods or provides services

consumer- person whose wants are satisfied by using goods and services

allocate- distribute

choice- option

(hope this ! )

c) was interpreted by the supreme court in gibbons v. ogden.

i hope it is the answer and it will you..