Which of the following best identifies the author's claim? A
Bull trout experienced high mortality rates as a result of the formation of the estuary and sediments released during dam deconstruction
B
Bull trout are adaptable to a variety of habitats and were able to survive in the river habitat during the dam deconstruction,
с
Bull trout remained in the estuary system after the dam deconstruction because the disruption had irreversibly altered the river habitat.
D
Bull trout are unable to live in high sediment loaded waters and migrated to avoid the conditions introduced during dam deconstruction

i do agree with robert moses’ statements about wiping out cities that are an “impediment to new growth”. in order to have a positive community, the city must continue to grow either in terms of size or economics. therefore wiping out cities that restrict growth benefits the overall society and all the people living in it. similar to a social contract, i believe that if a person was to live in a community they must sacrifice some of their rights, in this case property, for the overall good of the people. as long as these people living in the cities are reimbursed and the purpose of wiping out the cities is to serve the public, there is no problem with robert moses’ core idea.

correct answer for apex users would be /opportunities for growth/