Ap gov frq (A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Oregon v. Smith (1989).

(B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of Wisconsin v. Yoder led to a different holding than the holding in Oregon v. Smith.

(C) Describe an action that members of the state legislature could take if they disagreed with the decision in Oregon v. Smith.

No clue bro i’m sorry

Prior to the creation of the us constitution, the general view of representative government is that it only worked in very small-scale environments- essentially a city-state or smaller. otherwise, the actual reflection of popular will declined in the representatives (ie, the difference between 1 representative per 100 citizens and 1 representative per 10,000 citizens), and generally the whole process became inefficient and self-destructive.james madison, however, was like 'no beezy'. he remarked that small republics were prone to faction and thus collapsed quickly. a large republic, he said, had so many interests and factions that none could rule, and thus they had to moderate and compromise.

Ibelieve the answer is d.