The Supreme Court hears a case challenging a university’s affirmative-action admission policy, which benefits students from ethnic minority groups. The Supreme Court rules in support of the affirmative-action policy, indicating that the university must continue meeting admission quotas for students from ethnic minority groups, even though this right is not explicitly stated in the Constitution. What does this scenario reveal about how life terms and judicial review apply to the Supreme Court’s ability to shape public policy?

It allows the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it to modern times.
It requires the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution in cases regarding education.
It allows the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution and apply it without any checks.
It requires the Supreme Court to broadly interpret the Constitution in cases regarding civil liberties.