Which statement best explains these two points of view?
O Martin believed that the slave trade should be
considered constitutional, while Rutledge did not.
O Martin wanted to ban only the slave trade, while
Rutledge wanted to ban the practice of slavery
outright
O Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge
wanted to preserve the practice of importing
enslaved workers.
O Martin did not want to impose a tax on importing
enslaved workers, while Rutledge wanted to create
such a tax.

Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge

wanted to preserve the practice of importing

enslaved workers.

Explanation: In the passage, Martin asks for a tax or prohibition (ban) on Slave trade, while the other argued that three states would never go along with that and "the expectation is vain".

answer; a health care professional;

renewable resources- resources that can be replenished (such as trees)

nonrenewable resources- resources that are gone once they are used (such as fossil fuels)

producer-person who makes goods or provides services

consumer- person whose wants are satisfied by using goods and services

allocate- distribute

choice- option

(hope this ! )