Which of the following makes the most sense when it comes to the evolution of primates? 1 point
Humans and chimpanzees do not have similar DNA because they are no closer related to each other than any other animal on the planet
Humans and chimpanzees have DNA that is very similar because they both evolved from a common ancestor
Humans and Chimpanzees have similar DNA because Humans evolved from Chimpanzees.
Humans and chimpanzees do not have similar DNA because they share a common ancestor.
The similarity of DNA between two species has nothing to do with how closely they are related.

The correct answer is Humans and chimpanzees have DNA that is very similar because they both evolved from a common ancestor.

Explanation:

Both humans and chimpanzees are primates; this means both species belong to the same biological order (rank in taxonomy). Moreover, humans and chimpanzees share most of their DNA (around 99%). This indicates the two species are related and they evolved from the same ancestor. This implies a primate that existed million years ago (common ancestor) was the origin of these two species and due to this common ancestor they share most of their DNA; however, as both species changed separately the remaining DNA is different and this makes both species look and be different. According to this, the correct statement about the evolution of primates is "Humans and chimpanzees have DNA that is very similar because they both evolved from a common ancestor."

if this a multiple choice question you are not listing any possible answers. so if it is, i will just name all types of plate boundaries.

convergent boundaries

transform boundaries

divergent boundaries

plate boundary zones

i hope this you : )