Which excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines shows how precedent helps
support an argument?

if triangle abc is congruent to triangle def, their interior angles are congruent, because congruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent (cpctc).

that means ∠d is congruent to ∠a; ∠d is equal to 8x - 2.

interior angles of all triangles add to equal 180 degrees, so you can set the sum of these interior angle values equal to 180 and solve for x.

180 = (8x - 2) + 22 + 72

180 = 8x - 2 + 22 + 72

180 = 8x + 92

88 = 8x

11 = x

x = 11

the answer is c teaching students and collaborating with teachers on instructional content.

its hamilton county on plato.com

answer: no

explanation:

i thought it would be hard. yeah it took a little while to get used to but in all you will be fine. just do your work and stay out of drama.