Imagine that you are the principal of a school and you just found out that there was a fight in the lunchroom during lunch. You’ve asked many students and teachers who witnessed the fight to write down what they saw and who they think started the fight. Unfortunately, you have received many conflicting accounts that disagree not only as to who started the fight but also as to who was involved and when the fight even started. It’s important to remember that NO ONE is just plain lying.

Why would there be different stories of the event if no one is just plain lying?

What are the different types of people who might have seen this fight? (e. g., friends of those involved; people who don’t know the kids who were fighting; those who were fighting; teachers; students)

What might make one person’s story more believable or plausible than another person’s?

Firstdifferent people with different views of what they witnessed Some weren't there but was told ...sometimes the story want brief to them so they form theirs

Like I said different people..like friends, friends of friends, students,mates,juniors,workers even teachers,and maybe passerby's can witness it

Like I said againSome might witness the story and tell you in details ...some might not get a clear view of it and manipulate theirs to match with the story

Explanation:

is the art and science of cultivating the soil, growing crops and raising livestock. it includes the preparation of plant and animal products for people to use and their distribution to markets.

agriculture provides most of the world’s food and fabrics. cotton, wool, and leather are all agricultural products. agriculture also provides wood for construction and paper products.

these products, as well as the agricultural methods used, may vary from one part of the world to another.

idk

explanation:

‍♀️