(Not really a question, more like asking an opinion, also this is a philosophy question) A person is looking at a hill, he sees an animal that he thinks is a sheep and decides that there is a sheep in the direction that he is looking. He gets it wrong and the animal was not a sheep but further off in the distance there actually is a sheep so technically there was a sheep in the direction he was looking. Does that mean the person is still right?

yes

Explanation:

The person is still right because he said there was a sheep in his direction and there was just not the sheep he thought it was but a different sheep and he never said there is only 1 sheep like figure in that direction

from the word list given, the most suitable words that relate to the reason information were written would be:  

objectivity: lack of bias, judgment, or prejudice

accuracy: free of mistakes, to be correct

authority: the ability to tell people what to do or believe in

content: to be satisfied  

it can be said that the author made the article to present objectivity, to provide accurate information, to be the authority in the subject that he or she writes, and to be satisfied of the information quality given out.