30 points pls

one of the principal objections inculcated by the more respectable adversaries to the constitution, is its supposed violation of the political maxim, that the legislative, executive and judiciary departments ought to be separate and distinct. in the structure of the federal government, no regard, it is said, seems to have been paid to this essential precaution in favor of liberty. the several departments of power are distributed and blended in such a manner, as at once to destroy all symmetry and beauty of form; and to expose some of the essential parts of the edifice to the danger of being crushed by the disproportionate weight of other parts.

no political truth is certainly of greater intrinsic value or is stamped with the authority of more enlightened patrons of liberty than that on which the objection is founded. the accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. were the federal constitution therefore really chargeable with this accumulation of power or with a mixture of powers having a dangerous tendency to such an accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to inspire a universal reprobation of the system. i persuade myself however, that it will be made apparent to every one, that the charge cannot be supported, and that the maxim on which it relies, has been totally misconceived and misapplied. "

james madison, from federalist no. 47
identify the constitutional principle that is common in both this excerpt and federalist no. 51.
based on the constitutional principle identified in part (a), explain how the perspective in this excerpt compares with the perspective in federalist no. 51.
explain how the constitutional principle identified in part (a) is reflected in the constitution, including two examples to explain how it affects the u. s. political system.